@mpjgregoire @hypolite @clacke quillette? really? ugh, no thanks.
Conversation
Notices
-
nae (fuchsiashock@todon.eu)'s status on Saturday, 21-May-2022 14:53:58 UTC nae -
nae (fuchsiashock@todon.eu)'s status on Saturday, 21-May-2022 14:53:57 UTC nae @mpjgregoire @hypolite @clacke cato institute, as well. no, not gonna take anything they have to say about politics seriously at all.
Santa Claes 🇸🇪ðŸ‡ðŸ‡°ðŸŽ… likes this. -
hypolite (hypolite@friendica.mrpetovan.com)'s status on Sunday, 22-May-2022 04:29:10 UTC hypolite @clacke @emacsen @mpjgregoire @fuchsiashock I don't believe you will go anywhere with your understanding of other people's beliefs if you yourself believe they can be wrong in the absolute. Sure, they can be wrong according to your own moral framework, but it doesn't say anything about them, it only says something about your own moral framework. -
Emacsen (emacsen@emacsen.net)'s status on Sunday, 22-May-2022 04:29:11 UTC Emacsen @fuchsiashock @mpjgregoire @hypolite @clacke
I'm always a bit nervous about anyone from the Cato institute... (long stories there I can share over proverbial drinks), but I do think that based on the description that the review has that there's something to be valued from understanding the ways in which groups have their intrinsic value in their language and ways we can use that to reach more people and come together, which is very important, especially to vulnerable minorities.
-
M. Grégoire (mpjgregoire@mamot.fr)'s status on Sunday, 22-May-2022 04:29:11 UTC M. Grégoire @emacsen @fuchsiashock @hypolite @clacke In order to persuade people to change their minds, or to identify common goals for which they might be allies, we must understand why they hold their beliefs. That's especially important when they're wrong.
-