In the words of @codeberg themselves, this is why I am asking:
> Recently, someone on Mastodon said the world needs many Codebergs, and I can fully second that mission. [ . . . ]
> To reach an ultimate level of efficiency for Codeberg, I expect we require times 5 to 50 our current user count, that is 100k to 1 million. And if you fear the monopoly: this still leaves room for 73 to 730 instances if we want to replace Microsoft GitHub alone.
@clacke While I agree that orgs like Codeberg are a step forward (a sorely needed step), unless they federate, they will still lead to one forge to rule over all others.
I think forge-type software needs to work toward a model where code hosted on the forge is not privileged over code hosted on developers' machines.
The importance of centralized control by servers needs to be reduced.
@lnxw48a1 Yes, forges need to become less centralized and less critical to a repo.
ForgeFed is one step, so that you can contribute between forges. Putting the issues and discussions in the repo, so that you can back them up, contribute offline and trivially migrate, would be another important step.
@cstanhope@clacke Yes! We've got an initial test instance up at a temporary domain, but it's been a bit quiet lately and we haven't been able to get a meeting to decide on actually launching or buy a proper domain or anything. https://mesh.coop/ You'd be welcome to join our mailing list if you're interested in helping us get started: https://groups.io/g/codeforge/topics
@clacke@cstanhope (at least to start I suspect we want to find a fiscal host and avoid incorporating ourselves, just to make it easy; once we have it up and running and some money in the bank, then we could start talking about incorporating. But that's just my thoughts, obviously it's not up to me alone :) )