@mthie @YoSiJo

https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/937

@mthie @YoSiJo

https://mastodon.technology/@WoodpeckerCI/107009839456804855

Währe da zu erwähnen ;)

@mthie @YoSiJo

Ich suche was raus, ich denk das solte dann auch mal in nem blogpost vestgehalten werden ...

@jens well it is going on you could easily overlook https://mastodon.technology/@codeberg/107656864666135364 ...

@jens @codeberg

well codeberg has a own ci you just have apply for by creating an issue.

(Woodpecker is used for it)

@nuclear @fribbledom

I think it realy depends ...

If its a feature request: vote with thumbup or yor money (bounty) if you realy need it ...

For bugfixes you could gentle ask whats tje state ... in most cases devs just need more debug data (trace&logs& reproduce guides...)

But the stupid "any update" is just anoying

If it is a "I tested it with latest/test version and it still exist" it's a nice ping that already took some work from devs

@ck @codeberg

If you refer to build docker multi arch images, you prbably do search for the wrong solution ...

As demo i can suggest to look at: https://codeberg.org/woodpecker-plugins/plugin-docker-buildx

@ck @codeberg

ok now I'm interested on what kind of project you work on - sounds like an "embeded" one