@kees Well ... they are still "updating" Voyager though, right? ;-)
Notices by ck@chaos.social
-
ck@chaos.social's status on Monday, 15-Jan-2024 11:44:21 UTC ck -
ck@chaos.social's status on Thursday, 10-Feb-2022 10:40:25 UTC ck @codeberg
Ideally this would work without the need to create an account at a specific forge.
One of the clear benefits of send-email is that you don't have any need to create a local identity first in order to contribute. -
ck@chaos.social's status on Thursday, 10-Feb-2022 10:40:24 UTC ck @raboof
> since commits can already be signed [...]
Aaand and wie have come full circle to the email again 😄The hurdle of entry needs to be low enough for not-so-tech-savy people to become engaged in it. Any web-of-trust thingy that was supposed to work without a central authority was always anything but.
If we really want this to be an alternatives to send-email, we need it to be as simple as sending email first. -
ck@chaos.social's status on Thursday, 10-Feb-2022 10:39:23 UTC ck @jgoerzen
I agree, with the exception of the e-mail part.
Email has transitioned from a decentralized "good enough" to a federated mess to a literal cluster fuckery. I really want to have as little to do with it as I can. -
ck@chaos.social's status on Monday, 17-Jan-2022 19:22:33 UTC ck @codeberg Can it run KVM / Qemu virtual machines for building images and such?
-
ck@chaos.social's status on Monday, 17-Jan-2022 19:22:31 UTC ck @6543
No, that is not it at all, I will likely at some point want to run e2e tests that actually boot an on with bootloader, kernel etc.
KVM is the "simplest" solution for that.
@codeberg -
ck@chaos.social's status on Monday, 17-Jan-2022 19:22:26 UTC ck @6543
No, I always wanted to build my own Linux, so I am using the pandamic to actually maybe get something done.
Chances are good it might go back to the procrastination pile before I ever need e2e testing beyond containers, but you never know.