Notices by mcscx2 (mcscx2@status.vinilox.eu)
-
mcscx2 (mcscx2@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Monday, 28-Nov-2016 19:02:51 UTC mcscx2 @hannes2peer for my part, I'm personally ok with the FAQ being removed, for the specific reason: 1) it's rather outdated anyway and deals with no-longer supported features like private groups and hidden accounts, 2) many parts go into too much detail or describe rather obvious things..
So the faq could IMO be removed/replaced with some other faq. However I also agree with your opinion: It can't be right if a contributor to a collaborative GPL-like work can ask to remove all their contributions any time later. This would be like Evan Prodromou or a Linux kernel developer asking to remove all their code lines from a work, 2 years later, after others have continued the work. @simsa0 -
mcscx2 (mcscx2@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Oct-2016 15:23:29 UTC mcscx2 @zash there _are_ web frontends for IRC, e. g. on freenode. OK, maybe not shiny enough... -
mcscx2 (mcscx2@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Friday, 01-Jul-2016 11:26:27 UTC mcscx2 I'm considering upgrading a 2010 HP Proliant #DL380 !server with larger harddisks. Right now it has eight HP 146GB SAS disks.
The DL380G5 manual says the largest disks you can upgrade to is "HP 300GB 6G ENTerprise" or to "HP 500GB 3G SATA Midline".
An older (2008) version of the same manual even says 146GB disks are the largest you can use. (According to that I would be able to upgrade at all :-\)
Question is: Is the DL380G5 really that picky about harddisks or can I use the newer and cheaper "HP MSA 300GB 12G SAS 10K"?
What disks do other !server admins use to upgrade a DL380 G5? -
mcscx2 (mcscx2@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Thursday, 30-Jun-2016 21:40:01 UTC mcscx2 I've found a #HighAvailabilityCluster howto for #proxmox / #kvm: ur1.ca/pdxpi But it uses a shared NFS server for the guest image, I wonder if that could be avoided by some replication method. !virtualisation -
mcscx2 (mcscx2@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Thursday, 30-Jun-2016 19:42:33 UTC mcscx2 @mikael I want to virtualise just 1 windows server. There would be 2 psysical computers (called Master and Slave) with the virtualiser and there should be a synchronising mechanism to sync the guest windows machine from the Master physical computer to the Slave physical computer. The guest machine on Slave could be down all the time. In failover case (=Master system broken) the admin would start the replicated guest machine on Slave, so the users can continue their work with minimal downtime.
Now the question is what virtualisiation platform to use. -
mcscx2 (mcscx2@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Sunday, 22-Nov-2015 17:16:48 UTC mcscx2 @clacke ich habe mal für jemanden #Unison für bidirektionales Sychronisieren installiert. Das ha… -
mcscx2 (mcscx2@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Sunday, 22-Nov-2015 12:52:17 UTC mcscx2 @der ich bin ja rsync-Fan, aber ist rsync auch gut für bidirektionales Synchronisieren? Was passi… -
mcscx2 (mcscx2@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Saturday, 07-Nov-2015 16:23:26 UTC mcscx2 @vinilox is that a university internet connection? :-) #1000/200Mbit -
mcscx2 (mcscx2@status.vinilox.eu)'s status on Friday, 16-Jan-2015 18:05:19 UTC mcscx2 RP @amarcos@quitter.no : @mcscx @simsa0 Hi, I saw your name in the FAQ. Im a Spanish journalist of…