The wording about commercial activity indicates that this is more aimed at the silos than at GS, but if this passed then they could designate GS to be a "regulated social media platform" at leisure and create the new crime of "running an unregulated social media system".
Also, UK politicians are idiotic enough that they would think this was a good idea. Even under Corbyn, the authoritarian nature of the Labour party shouldn't be underestimated. An obvious indicator is that they voted enthusiastically for some of the most invasive spying powers anywhere (the IP act of 2016).
Then there will ne no instances in the UK. Are there? Does it matter much? Nevertheless, this need resistance to keep other countries from adopting it.
@gargon I didn't look up the referenced list of social media platforms, but it sounds like they maintain a regulated list. They also mention blogs in the definition of a "social media platform". Federated instances seem like a similar case: my instance is for my own personal use, so they'd only be able to censor it in the same way they'd censor my personal blog (well, if I were to live in the UK, that is).
Federated instances that allow users to sign up are likely a different story based on their level of popularity. But censorship would be fruitless: other instances would have the data they're trying to censor. That includes my personal instance. I'm outside the UK's jurisdiction, and even if I weren't, we go back to the blog argument.
I'd say that I'm curious to see how this might be implemented in a federation, but I'm really not---this shouldn't happen at all.
This concerns the entire fediverse: UK wants to force every social network to register with their government, threatening an immense fine otherwise. Now *that* sounds more like censorship https://twitter.com/AlecMuffett/status/827585268391739392
So, with this definition in mind, we can quickly dismantle the claim that the US is a democracy:
1: PEOPLE don't cast a vote for president. They cast a vote that is considered by an Elector from the Electoral College that votes for their state in the election.
2: There are a variety of means in which a minority position can be forced through Congress in the United States, such as an Executive Order, or with the Executive Veto.
3: The way that the votes are distributed is fairly gerrymandered. The vote distribution of the Electoral College is not proportional. As an example, one person from Vermont's vote, is worth the same as three people from Texas. In this way, less populous states actually hold more power in the vote.
4: The commoners have almost no say in their actual government. A study published a few years ago found that the average American has pretty much zero effective say in the policy decisions that affect them.
Let's look a little deeper into that, now. Most Americans describe themselves as in a Democracy. But what is a Democracy? To answer that, we need look at the origin of the word in Greek: Dēmokratía. When translated to english, this means "rule of the commoners" In the parlaiments of the Greek city-states, each and every person whom was not a slave was given the right to vote in open forums held about the topics of the day and the majority vote would be adopted as the position.
Annah (maiyannah@community.highlandarrow.com)'s status on Friday, 03-Feb-2017 16:23:43 UTC
Annah"Nvidia is putting a stop to the resale of bundled promotional game keys by tying them to a specific graphics card purchase, according to Ars Technica. Users will now have to redeem codes via the GeForce Experience (GFE) app, which is directly linked to third-party services like Steam and Uplay. Users must also ensure that the requisite graphics card is "installed before redemption." GFE then performs "a hardware verification step to ensure the coupon code is redeemed on the system with the qualifying GPU."
Most of these games are shit to begin with, and now they're "free" shit thats basically handcuffed to the video card.
@vinzv More than 2 years assuming I'd have the same salary as my current day job (which I wouldn't need to have). Assuming taxes etc would be deducted.
So, people are giving 70.000$ to someone selling them a non-federated version of GNU Social? Well played - at least in terms of marketing. Imagine how long e.g. @mmn could work full-time for 70.000$...!