Conversation
Notices
-
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn@social.umeahackerspace.se)'s status on Sunday, 18-Jan-2015 23:22:30 UTC MMN-o ✅⃠ I have a secret desire to implement a Diaspora-compatible protocol directly to !gnusocial core. -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn@social.umeahackerspace.se)'s status on Sunday, 18-Jan-2015 15:07:26 UTC MMN-o ✅⃠ Huh? You mean people shouldn't be able to have the same username as someone else - even if they're on another server? -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn@social.umeahackerspace.se)'s status on Sunday, 18-Jan-2015 21:32:22 UTC MMN-o ✅⃠ Would you say the same for email? If @hotmail.com registers a thousand nicknames, why shouldn't @gmail.com let users register the same there? -
lnxw48 (Linux Walt) (lnxw48@fresh.federati.net)'s status on Sunday, 18-Jan-2015 21:39:26 UTC lnxw48 (Linux Walt) @roland @mmn @erkanyilmaz I think a better solution is to let the fullname (user@host) override shortnames (@user), even when the shortname is a known account to the server.
MMN-o ✅⃠ repeated this. -
Erkan Yılmaz (erkan@fediverse.com)'s status on Sunday, 18-Jan-2015 21:57:34 UTC Erkan Yılmaz exactly -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn@social.umeahackerspace.se)'s status on Sunday, 18-Jan-2015 22:39:01 UTC MMN-o ✅⃠ That's simply not a good solution. -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn@social.umeahackerspace.se)'s status on Sunday, 18-Jan-2015 23:08:40 UTC MMN-o ✅⃠ Yes, a full WebFinger ID should be prioritised. My comment was regarding applying arbitrary centralisation restrictions on the nickname system. -
Erkan Yılmaz (erkan@fediverse.com)'s status on Sunday, 18-Jan-2015 23:37:51 UTC Erkan Yılmaz I wonder if it goes faster when you get the specific code from !friendica (which is also in #php)
-