...yeah, or just IRC. There are mobile friendly clients, clients integrated for web browser use, multiple desktop varieties. They could even pre-configure and brand a "Creative Commons chat client" since it's all !floss.
IRC is excellent because it doesn't require a preregistered account, it is a common and well-spread means of communication, it can be integrated with !xmpp chatrooms if you control the server(s) etc. None of this is possible with Slack, at least not in any way that is future proof.
@fnadde42 (and since the community was already on IRC it's extremely weird to move _away_ from an open environment and lock the communication in with a proprietary vendor).
Btw, this means that noone who is the member of a country which has a trade embargo with the USA can become part of the "chatty" community of Creative Commons, right?
Since everyone who uses Slack must become customers there.
@mmn @fnadde42 It's always the case that if you don't care about freedom or having control over your systems then whenever the latest and trendiest chat app comes out then you'll switch to it in a heartbeat. Possibly the solution here could be Matrix. That way the trendy people can still use their trendy app until they find that the company which makes it never actually believed in openness and decides to turn it into a walled garden.
@bob They say their IRC channel is linked in with a bot to Slack (I guess just relaying "<SlackUser1> blah blah", eliminating tab completion).
I'm curious however whether that's even allowed by Slack's EULA and - more importantly - what happens when Freenode notices an extremely spammy user (think ~20 Slack users communicating simultaneously, relaying everything to IRC).
@mmn @fnadde42 Consistent state and complete scrollback across multiple devices is a basic requirement of a multiuser chat system now. I know this is true because all serious IRC users have some complicated technique such as a bouncer, ssh+screen or irccloud to circumvent the problem. I've been playing with Matrix, which @bob mentioned, in the last day or two and I think it has real potential as a Slack killer. Their integration as an actual ircd in Freenode's network works surprisingly well.
@ddeimeke I agree to some extend, but I think some of your arguments are to negative. GPG: yes, the web-of-trust is complicated. But I would argue that many people can just ignore it. For them it is simply "secure enough" to just encrypt the mail. How many people verify Signal fingerprints for Example? Almost nobody. And this is fine. IRC: there are Web services and clients (for desktop and mobile) which make IRC really easy and nice to work with. I never used Slack, but I talks to people who use it and saw some video tutorial. For me it is still not more than a nice user interface for stuff you can also do with IRC. At Nextcloud for example we decided to stick to IRC, Discourse and XMPP (internally) by purpose and I'm happy and proud that we took this decision.
@rozzin Yeah and now they're happy about "wow, we have hundredsomething users, that's awesome" without realising that they will still likely just be idling and never partake in discussion because Slack will simply hide it when people ignore the channel since people now have only rushed in because they saw the notice about a new channel.
Slack can't make people communicate in parallell more than with any other tool. For that we need to rewire our brains.
@clacke @bes Riot seems to eat battery power, although I was subscribed to the main Matrix channel which is high traffic. It might be a similar problem to Antox though in that perhaps it indefinitely keeps the connection open, preventing the device from going into sleep mode.