@dualhammers @alcinnz @riveck Okay, this might be a language barrier thing. I understood it as "To repair (instead of buy the same thing anew) is sustainable".
Of course this is not true for every product in every state. A broken coal power plant should be dismanteled and be replaced by a more sustainable method of power generation.
This is what I meant with the thought of repairing stuff. It *should* be an option, you *should* consider it, you *should* be able/allowed to do it.
Notices by Aram Loosman (aramloosman@tooting.ch)
-
Aram Loosman (aramloosman@tooting.ch)'s status on Tuesday, 03-May-2022 14:13:25 UTC Aram Loosman -
Aram Loosman (aramloosman@tooting.ch)'s status on Tuesday, 03-May-2022 14:12:47 UTC Aram Loosman @dualhammers @alcinnz @riveck No, that's not inaccurate. Of course there is new material in the picture when repairing, even if it is only a screw, glue or gas for welding. That is not the point. Also if something is completely destroyed it might not be feasible to repair (i.E. a broken chassis on a car which has to pass inspection), but still the thought of repairing FIRST is sustainable. Let's not divert energy from the topic here.