@clacke
> I'm talking epidemic data by government agencies, not trials by manufacturers
That does the data more convincing. But is it corrected for confounding variables?
Like the unvaccinated being predominantly from segments of the population who are more likely to be hospitalised for COVID anyway. Eg because they're older, indigenous, or have chronic health problems that have led them a 'natural health care' discourse, including vaccine scepticism.
(2/2)