Conversation

Notices

1. Verius (verius@community.highlandarrow.com)'s status on Wednesday, 10-Aug-2016 11:37:06 UTC Verius

   • Annah
   @maiyannah Oh, then wikipedia is wrong (imagine that). It said proprietary with open source parts.
   • Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) repeated this.
   • Annah (maiyannah@community.highlandarrow.com)'s status on Wednesday, 10-Aug-2016 11:35:35 UTC Annah
     @verius Vivaldi is not proprietary https://vivaldi.com/source
     
     I don't know that I can be arsed to rewrite a codebase to not hide shit it shouldn't be hiding, though.
     Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) repeated this.
   • Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) (clackemovedtoheldscalla@quitter.se)'s status on Wednesday, 10-Aug-2016 12:17:51 UTC Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)

     in reply to

     • Annah
     @verius @maiyannah Well, https://vivaldi.com/source could be "most of" the source in the same way that Chromium is "most of" Chrome?
   • Annah (maiyannah@community.highlandarrow.com)'s status on Wednesday, 10-Aug-2016 12:18:25 UTC Annah

     in reply to

     • Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
     @clacke @verius I believe the seed of truth to that is the mail and some other extended features are _not_ open source.
     Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) repeated this.