Conversation

Notices

1. Caleb James DeLisle (cjd@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 07-Apr-2022 05:51:41 UTC Caleb James DeLisle

   in reply to

   • Wolf480pl
   • Tim Makarios
   • laconicif
   • 2big2fail

   @laconicif @2big2fail @wolf480pl @TMakarios

   Indeed, FDR threatened the SCOTUS with court-packing if they wouldn't see things his way, so there wasn't a lot of judicial oversight.

   • Santa Claes 🇸🇪🇭🇰🎅 likes this.
   • Tim Makarios (tmakarios@theres.life)'s status on Thursday, 07-Apr-2022 05:51:42 UTC Tim Makarios

     in reply to

     • Wolf480pl
     • 2big2fail

     @cjd
     How was it even vaguely constitutional?
     @wolf480pl @2big2fail

   • laconicif (laconicif@thebag.social)'s status on Thursday, 07-Apr-2022 05:51:42 UTC laconicif

     in reply to

     • Wolf480pl
     • Tim Makarios
     • 2big2fail

     Narrator voice: It wasn’t.

     The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

     • Fourth Amendment
   • Caleb James DeLisle (cjd@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 07-Apr-2022 05:51:43 UTC Caleb James DeLisle

     in reply to

     • Wolf480pl
     • 2big2fail

     @wolf480pl @2big2fail
     Zero debate

   • Caleb James DeLisle (cjd@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 07-Apr-2022 05:51:44 UTC Caleb James DeLisle

     in reply to

     • 2big2fail

     @2big2fail
     Wow and it's not even an actual law, what a prick.

   • Wolf480pl (wolf480pl@mstdn.io)'s status on Thursday, 07-Apr-2022 05:51:44 UTC Wolf480pl

     in reply to

     • 2big2fail

     @cjd @2big2fail
     why is it always executive orders that are most evil

   • 2big2fail (2big2fail@bitcoinhackers.org)'s status on Thursday, 07-Apr-2022 05:51:48 UTC 2big2fail

     89yrs ago