Conversation

Notices

1. ˗ˏˋ Doug Belshaw ˎˊ˗ 💥☠️✊: (dajbelshaw@fosstodon.org)'s status on Friday, 11-Feb-2022 11:46:58 UTC ˗ˏˋ Doug Belshaw ˎˊ˗ 💥☠️✊:

   • sтυx⚡

   Oh wow, just saw (via @stux) that *editing* toots is going to soon be a thing. Within a 5-minute time window, if I've understood correctly?

   https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/pull/17320

   • Santa Claes 🇸🇪🇭🇰🎅 likes this.
   • sтυx⚡ (stux@mstdn.social)'s status on Friday, 11-Feb-2022 11:47:16 UTC sтυx⚡

     in reply to

     • Ru

     @celia Checkout commits :ablobwink:

     We use Glitch-soc that has also merged it already yay!

     https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/commits/main

     Santa Claes 🇸🇪🇭🇰🎅 likes this.
   • Ru (celia@fosstodon.org)'s status on Friday, 11-Feb-2022 11:47:22 UTC Ru

     in reply to

     • sтυx⚡

     @stux Wait, I swear I saw a PR merged? Let me check, hmm...

   • Ru (celia@fosstodon.org)'s status on Friday, 11-Feb-2022 11:47:22 UTC Ru

     in reply to

     • sтυx⚡

     @stux https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/pull/16766

     Oh, it's a draft, and was closed...

   • sтυx⚡ (stux@mstdn.social)'s status on Friday, 11-Feb-2022 11:47:23 UTC sтυx⚡

     in reply to

     • Ru

     @celia @dajbelshaw Haha nops! It will stay

   • Ru (celia@fosstodon.org)'s status on Friday, 11-Feb-2022 11:47:24 UTC Ru

     in reply to

     • sтυx⚡

     @dajbelshaw And in return, delete and re-draft will be going away... 🥲

     @stux

   • glyn (underlap@fosstodon.org)'s status on Friday, 11-Feb-2022 11:47:56 UTC glyn

     in reply to

     • sтυx⚡

     @dajbelshaw @stux Haven't read the PR in detail (seems to support just a subset of status edits), but I would imagine it would be necessary to prevent a toot from escaping its original instance for a while so it could be edited. Once it had been federated, I'd imagine it would be impossible to edit a toot without the delete-redraft-toot behaviour.

   • Santa Claes 🇸🇪🇭🇰🎅 (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Friday, 11-Feb-2022 11:47:56 UTC Santa Claes 🇸🇪🇭🇰🎅

     in reply to

     • sтυx⚡
     • glyn
     @underlap @stux @dajbelshaw Hence the 5-minute limit, I expect.
   • Santa Claes 🇸🇪🇭🇰🎅 (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Friday, 11-Feb-2022 13:58:41 UTC Santa Claes 🇸🇪🇭🇰🎅

     in reply to

     • humanetech
     • sтυx⚡
     • glyn
     @humanetech @stux @dajbelshaw @underlap I've been thinking for years that a feature like this should exist and that the delay can only be beneficial. For synchronous communication there is always XMPP and Matrix.
     
     Do Pleroma and Misskey have federated chat or is it local only?
   • humanetech (humanetech@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 11-Feb-2022 13:58:42 UTC humanetech

     in reply to

     • sтυx⚡
     • glyn

     @dajbelshaw @underlap @stux

     Is there another place where there's a good functional description of the feature? I clicked through a bunch of issues and PR's, but..

     Is there's a 5 min. waiting time before it is actually sent? Making back and forth much slower. Or are they directly federated, but because they are so recent, people will notice a malicious edit?

   • ˗ˏˋ Doug Belshaw ˎˊ˗ 💥☠️✊: (dajbelshaw@fosstodon.org)'s status on Friday, 11-Feb-2022 13:58:43 UTC ˗ˏˋ Doug Belshaw ˎˊ˗ 💥☠️✊:

     in reply to

     • sтυx⚡
     • glyn

     @underlap Yeah, I guess so... @stux

   • Santa Claes 🇸🇪🇭🇰🎅 (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Friday, 11-Feb-2022 16:32:32 UTC Santa Claes 🇸🇪🇭🇰🎅

     in reply to

     • humanetech
     • sтυx⚡
     • glyn
     @humanetech @stux @dajbelshaw @underlap "forked" to me means someone else got a word in and it wasn't a thread monopolized by a dialogue.
   • humanetech (humanetech@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 11-Feb-2022 16:32:33 UTC humanetech

     in reply to

     • Santa Claes 🇸🇪🇭🇰🎅
     • sтυx⚡
     • glyn

     @clacke @stux @dajbelshaw @underlap

     I don't know about differences with other apps.

     Some discussions, and often the better ones have replies in rather quick succession. If there'd be 5 min. intervals between posts there'd be much more likelihood for a discussion to be forked.

     But maybe this is not how it works.. just not really clear to me.

   • Santa Claes 🇸🇪🇭🇰🎅 (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Friday, 11-Feb-2022 17:55:32 UTC Santa Claes 🇸🇪🇭🇰🎅

     in reply to

     • humanetech
     • sтυx⚡
     • glyn
     @humanetech @stux @dajbelshaw @underlap I love them.
   • humanetech (humanetech@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 11-Feb-2022 17:55:33 UTC humanetech

     in reply to

     • Santa Claes 🇸🇪🇭🇰🎅
     • sтυx⚡
     • glyn

     @clacke @stux @dajbelshaw @underlap

     My experience is that once you have fork, then people jump in without reading the other forks. Discussions can become quite involved to manage if they branch out in big ways. I had an example some time ago where I had, I think, about 47 forks on my first toot.

   • humanetech (humanetech@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 11-Feb-2022 17:55:33 UTC humanetech

     in reply to

     • Santa Claes 🇸🇪🇭🇰🎅
     • sтυx⚡
     • glyn

     @clacke @stux @dajbelshaw @underlap

     Diagram of a super-forked discussion..

   • humanetech (humanetech@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 11-Feb-2022 17:55:37 UTC humanetech

     in reply to

     • Santa Claes 🇸🇪🇭🇰🎅
     • sтυx⚡
     • glyn

     @clacke @stux @dajbelshaw @underlap

     Yes, that would be good, except that they react while you - due to the char limit - are still typing the follow-up that gives the proper context.

   • Santa Claes 🇸🇪🇭🇰🎅 (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Friday, 11-Feb-2022 18:03:27 UTC Santa Claes 🇸🇪🇭🇰🎅

     in reply to

     • humanetech
     • sтυx⚡
     • glyn
     @stux I remove all the ats, they are represented below anyway. @humanetech @dajbelshaw @underlap
   • sтυx⚡ (stux@mstdn.social)'s status on Friday, 11-Feb-2022 18:03:28 UTC sтυx⚡

     in reply to

     • Santa Claes 🇸🇪🇭🇰🎅
     • humanetech
     • glyn

     @clacke @humanetech @dajbelshaw @underlap :blobcatgiggle: this is an edited post?