@deadsuperhero Gonna be honest, the more I read of it, the less I really like it. Â It isn't solving any of the problems the existing protocols have, and is introducing new ones.
A long while ago, I said that I was going to make a category on the Mastodon discourse (forum) for other parts of the fediverse to join the conversation.
But I didn't actually ask, is this something developers of GNU Social/postActiv/Pleroma etc. would be interested in?
Discussions on this category I assume would mostly be about how to be as compatible with each other as possible.
Lasagna protocol: Addressed Use of obsolete component protocols: Addressed Complexity: Addressed Ambiguity: Addressed Lack of consolidated documentation: Addressed Lack of (advisory) privacy: Addressed, although I know you think this rather *creates* a problem Lack of independent implementations: The number of independent implementations looks like it will soonish outnumber OStatus
"Addressed" not implying "100% SOLVED". Work is ongoing.