@gargron I think nobody has tried to count how many accounts are actually actively used, and when arguing that Masto brought a great benefit to humanity, I'm going to err on the side of caution.
I don't think every person made more than 6 accounts, I think that for each person that actively uses the software, there are several that had a look and then got disappointed, bored or distracted, because you never know what something is before you try it.
Do you believe the > 100k users each on quitter.se and gnusocial.de are all active human users of GNU Social? I personally have created accounts on at least six GS servers and one Masto server in the last year.
@maiyannah@matteodem@ghedipunk@simonv3 Because so many folks are already locked into github, another option would be to add an ostatus bridge for github. I think an independent 3rd party could do that, but I haven''t worked through the details. I prefer not trying to convince everyone to move, but just letting the folks who want to move do so. Github could revoke its API key, but unlike some, I doubt they would.
Decentralization and self-hosting certainly aren't synonyms, but they also aren't separate.
You can't have decentralization without making it easy for people to host their own nodes, and people hosting things on their own is by definition not centralization.
A decentralized network and interoperability between nodes of course doesn't come about by itself, but hosting your own gitlab/gittea/whatever and stepping away from the social and technological Single Point of Failure that is github, and that is huge progress.
If we want to stay a cult of technological inbreeds consisting exclusively of people born before 1985 and those few who make the effort to climb the wall before knowing whether it's worth it: Yes, absolutely.
If we want people to find our projects and effortlessly contribute their improvements, we need to provide platforms where those projects can be accessible. And if we want the world to be a better place for free software and freedom in general, we need those platforms not to be github, facebook, slack and discord.
If we want new people to join the creation of Free Software, we can't push the effort to them. We can't build it and they will come. If we make the first contribution as frictionless as possible, they will learn the proper tools in time.
Centralization has absolutely solved the accessibility problem.
A vast majority of Swedes all ages have their own blog now, except they call it a facebook account and they don't control it.
Most new Free Software projects are on github, and people are finding and contributing to projects with ease. But their data is in the hands of an uncaring corporation.
@matteodem If you hover over the @notjeff link you'll see that they're on gs.smuglo.li. To find out what servers are blocked, I guess you'll have to ask @gargron. Some instances list their blocks on their about page, mastosoc doesn't.
@gargron I don't remember the correct numbers, but I believe that I'm in the ballpark when I say that identi.ca before the #pumpocalypse had something like 120000 users, and Evan kept something like 20000 users when filtering for any activity at all in the preceding 12 months.