Conversation

Notices

1. @mcscx@quitter.se (mcscx@quitter.se)'s status on Friday, 07-Apr-2017 15:46:04 UTC @mcscx@quitter.se

   • Wolfgang Romey
   @hier GNUsocial-Clients funktionieren nicht für Mastodon. Auf der Seite ist Mastodon nicht kompatibel zu GS. Die haben aber 1-2 eigene Apps
   • @mcscx@quitter.se (mcscx@quitter.se)'s status on Friday, 07-Apr-2017 16:07:52 UTC @mcscx@quitter.se

     • Wolfgang Romey
     @hier  das war eine Designentscheidung von Gargron.
   • AndStatus (andstatus@loadaverage.org)'s status on Friday, 07-Apr-2017 16:45:07 UTC AndStatus

     • thefaico
     • Wolfgang Romey
     @hier No, Mastodon is incompatible with AndStatus, because nobody implemented corresponding AndStatus extension so far
   • AndStatus (andstatus@loadaverage.org)'s status on Friday, 07-Apr-2017 18:10:30 UTC AndStatus

     • thefaico
     • Shnoulle
     @shnoulle I don't know about ostatus - this is a server to server protocol. What's about client protocol, Mastodon developer just decided to creat his own protocol. It's not better than GNU Social's, from a client point of view. It's just different :-(
     @mcscx@quitter.se likes this.
   • AndStatus (andstatus@loadaverage.org)'s status on Saturday, 08-Apr-2017 06:21:11 UTC AndStatus

     • thefaico
     • Shnoulle
     @shnoulle AndStatus has good modularity, which allows to add new APIs quite easily. So no wander that someone plays with this. The main strategic question is: why create another subpar client API, when there is a clear (albeit not that easy to implement...) way to implement far more powerful one, which would support federated architecture of GNU Social.