Conversation
Notices
-
@augustus the fucking English won't deal with terror attacks, they placate them. That shit doesn't happen in Russia. For good reason. The only way to fight terror is to bomb anyone involved in religion. (Faith is fine, but region is fucking evil)
- Hallå Kitteh repeated this.
-
@afaeinthecrowd @augustus Yes, the English are pussies, as we saw in Northern Ireland.
This was sarcasm.
They probably took the article down because they re-evaluated how sure they really were at the identity of the terrorist.
-
@clacke @afaeinthecrowd if they're not pussies, why are they allowing these people to live and walk our streets? if you're not willing to kill people in order to defend your land and the future of your children, you don't deserve a future
-
@augustus @afaeinthecrowd They didn't kill random sympathizers and potential terrorists during the Troubles either. They upheld order in the streets and did not give in to the disgraceful violence, even though they knew they would never be able to stop every attack while maintaining an open and free society.
-
@clacke @afaeinthecrowd violence is not disgraceful it's the foundation of sovereignty, law, order and everything you love
-
@augustus
Aaahaha, because he's still in fucking prison. He was sentenced to two years about a year ago.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-22/london-terrorism-suspect-named-hate-preacher-abu-izzadeen
The Independent also named him before taking it down. I guess all of the press heard the same rumor and then went and named each other as "second source".
-
@augustus @afaeinthecrowd I was talking about the violence of the IRA.
-
@clacke @augustus secularism is a poison. But the world needs warriors with a soul. Not idiots who follow orders. That is what we lack nowadays. The YouTube generation are destroying their own future. The only way to stop terrorists is with the promise that we would wipe them and their families out. It would only take a few "show of force" moments to do this, but the only ones willing to do it are Russia and America.
I hate this but it's a reality. The celts did it to the Romans. It must be done again.
-
@afaeinthecrowd @augustus Religion is a virus and secularism is the vaccine.
Terrorism is a crime, although a heinous one, and is dealt with through police work.
-
@afaeinthecrowd @clacke but violence is mean and nasty and nazi and securing our own survival is low status so faggy latte drinking hipster faggots and urbanite journalists will think i'm a waycis if we unleash a hurricane of redemptive violence, friend. can't we just play john lennon on the piano some more and hope they learn to fuck our daughters and leave us alone instead
-
@clacke @augustus wrong. Secularist and religious behaviour are poisons.
Spirituality however, that is for each of us to find. The idea of "belonging" to something is outdated, no matter what sect. Once the first 2 principles die, the higher order can flourish!!
-
@augustus @afaeinthecrowd You won't catch me saying that any violence is unconditionally wrong. I am for well-tempered, proportional and just violence.
Securing our own survival? Ban cars and sodas.
-
@afaeinthecrowd @augustus Secularism keeps the state out of your spirituality, as long as you keep your spirituality out of the state.
-
@clacke @augustus my little group have no leader, we explore together and have no need for that. But we all are happy to admit our goals. Not one wants any ill for the world, but there are many we have "ill wishes for"..
-
@augustus Someone is calling for a dictatorship, cause that is what is Russia right now. UK has killed quite the lot in Irak/Syria @clacke
-
@afaeinthecrowd @augustus Sounds like a pleasant enough bunch. :-)
-
@ghostdancer democracy is immoral and evil fam. you wouldn't design an aeroplane by asking the passengers what the best way to do it is, so why would you design a government in the same way? citizens don't know anything about how a government should be structured and run, it should be delegated entirely to experts with a proven track record of success.
if we never had democracy in the UK we never would have elected the here today gone tomorrow neoliberal opportunists of new labour who invaded Iraq in the first place because we would've been ruled by people who had skin in the game and would be able to see that such an incursion would benefit nobody. democracy selects for slimy liars like Blair who are willing to slaughter millions in order to get what he thinks is a career boost
and finally, who did we kill in Syria? we never intervened there at all. in fact the government tried multiple times and it was stopped
-
@clacke @augustus we are a lovely group of witches. Many styles and various ethos, but good people. THAT is how faith must be. Everything else is just hating other humans.
I have a devout Muslim friend, he belongs to a group that is just like mine. The search for spiritual shit is a quest, the truly spiritual don't see the religion, we see faith. It is the future, and the Internet disassociating people from the idiots they are geographically near will actually (hilariously) solve it c
-
No, feudalism lasted as long as land was wealth, and all wealth was land. Industrialism killed feudalism and its nobility. There is a reason why Napoleon's Grande Armée was the first mass army of citizen soldiers with a meritocratic officer corps. @moonman @ghostdancer @augustus
-
@hardbass2k8 @ghostdancer @augustus @lambadalambda @clacke I really only have criticisms, other systems just blow up in other ways.
-
@moonman @ghostdancer @augustus @lambadalambda @clacke without trying to sound like some edgy anarchist, the obvious solution would be to cease any attempts at structuring human interaction beyond the bare necessities. If it breaks into bits eventually it really isn't worth wasting billions of man hours on.
-
@hardbass2k8 @ghostdancer @augustus @lambadalambda @clacke that is my preference as well, but I think that just means you lose out to the more ordered, hierarchical competitor. Even if down the road they collapse in the usual way, you're already long gone by then :-(
-
@hardbass2k8 @lambadalambda @moonman @augustus @ghostdancer
No need to try to sound like one if you are one. And you're probably right, although there's a huge discussion to be had about the definition of "bare necessities". Ping @dtluna, the edgy anarchist conspicuously absent in this discussion. :-)
-
@moonman @lambadalambda @augustus @ghostdancer @hardbass2k8
I share this worry. #ancapistan has every reason to worry about powerful democratic military empires conquering it.
-
@lambadalambda @moonman @augustus @ghostdancer @hardbass2k8
Also, like Bismarck, I wonder if Ancapistan doesn't need to cease to be Ancapistan and get some state welfare just to slow down the proletarian revolution.
-
@clacke @moonman @augustus @ghostdancer @hardbass2k8 I don't see a way for ancapistan to prosper if people don't magically all follow the NAP. But communism would work too if 'everybody did it right'.
-
@lambadalambda @moonman @augustus @ghostdancer @hardbass2k8
Yeah, that's the difficult part when evaluating state forms. "Social Democracy works, look at Sweden!" ... Yeah, or maybe it works because it's Sweden and actually worked really well back in the 30s too, before the utopia was fully realized. We reached Peak Social Democracy in the 70s, ran out of money, and have been scaling it back every since.
-
@clacke @moonman @augustus @ghostdancer @lambadalambda there is also a huge difference between a perceived system working the way it is advertised to work and the collection of mechanisms that stretch far beyond the declared boundaries of the system. If you want to copy a system that is extremely resilient against such influences you should probably copy the catholic church, even though its importance is steadily declining it had a pretty good run.
-
@afaeinthecrowd @augustus @clacke Secularism just means separation of church and state... You oppose that?