Conversation

Notices

1. David Thompson (davexunit@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 14-Jan-2016 14:08:04 UTC David Thompson
   When a class in an OOP language ends in "er", a simple function would likely have been better.  OOP often adds complexity to simple tasks.
   • Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) repeated this.
   • Christopher M. Hobbs (cmhobbs@loadaverage.org)'s status on Thursday, 14-Jan-2016 14:54:55 UTC Christopher M. Hobbs

     in reply to
     @davexunit I mostly agree with this statement.
     Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) repeated this.
   • David Thompson (davexunit@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 14-Jan-2016 15:20:10 UTC David Thompson

     in reply to

     • Christopher M. Hobbs
     @cmhobbs it doesn't always apply, but I see it *a lot*.
     Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) repeated this.
   • Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) (clackemovedtoheldscalla@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 14-Jan-2016 17:45:58 UTC Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)

     • Christopher M. Hobbs
     @cmhobbs @davexunit I prefer the method to be called something generic like process(), do() or call(), when it's really just a functor.