Conversation

I finally skimmed through the newish Planet 9 paper that I'm supposed to talk about with 2 journalists today. The authors (all dudes, by the way) basically say that my team's work (and the work of another independent team) that meticulously tracks and accounts for observation biases is wrong and not worth their consideration, because it doesn't agree with their conclusions.

So now I'm mad. These will be fun interviews, I guess? Changing it up from complaining about SpaceX at least...