Tried the RAADS-R autism self-eval. Interesting! The interpretation is confusing:
50 Some autistic traits, but likely not autistic (yet some autistic people score as low as 44).
65 The minimum score at which autism is considered.
90 Stronger indications of autism, although non-autistics may score as high.
130 The mean score of autistic people; strong evidence for autism.
160 Very strong evidence for autism.
227 The maximum score autistic people acquired in Ritvoβs seminal paper on the RAADSβR.
[9]240 The maximum possible RAADSβR score
Is "not autistic" 25 and below? I guess, because if it's 25β50, what is below then? I guess "some traits" is 50β65? But what is 25β50 then? Are they supposed to be overlapping so that 0β50 is "not" and 25β65 is "some traits"?