I have spent the last two weeks in conferences with other science communicators and the general consensus in discussions was that (1) Twitter is dying and (2) it’s not clear what will replace it. (And not much enthusiasm about Mastodon, it seems.)
@AstroKatie I think the big hangup is that people want a centralized platform as that's what they're used to, but too many popped up at once prevent any one of them from gaining critical mass.
@AstroKatie Every other day it seems I see something like "oh move to spoutible" "oh move to post" "oh move to...newbelephant" (I made that one up but give it a week).
I honestly think sci commers won't move en masse until enough big ppl in the field gather somewhere. Then they'll saunter in and pretend they are NOT following the popular people.
@AstroKatie disappointing (but not surprising) that Mastodon isn’t more in the discourse for the future of online social media… although I remain hopeful we’ll get all the ‘good ones’ over here eventually 😉
@AstroKatie@hollie We just launched a volunteer-driven site http://SpreadMastodon.org to help explain it and make signing up crazy easier. Mastodon is our best shot to #TakeBackSocial. I hope it might make Mastodon more approachable to people like your colleagues (who are far from alone!).
@AstroKatie Of course, Mastodon can’t be better than Twitter before Elon. That will take a few years, but it is good enough for now and the basic idea seems valid. (I would still like to retoot with comments though) #astodon
@AstroKatie@hollie It's designed this way, you won't have an algorithm recommending you stuff that could interest you, likes are stricltly private and you can't quote a message you boost. It's all by design, to fight virality and the culture of immediacy that is at the heart of Twitter.
@AstroKatie@hollie also I find it quite curious that scientists of all people would find Mastodon too complicated.I've heard this criticism from the general public, but that surprises me.
@AstroKatie My experience of Mastodon has been much superior to Twitter and engagement has increased noticeably even over the last few weeks as, presumably, more people abandon Twitter. I don't find it siloed at all and I make extensive uses of Lists, as I did on Twitter, to shape the content that I see. Seems to be a lot of unnecessary FUD being spread about Mastodon.
@AstroKatie@hollie that's unfortunate. Hashtags help spread information and stuff that gets "engagement" across the fediverse usually shows up under the # feed. I have seen a bunch of creators run AB tests between the same content on both current Twitter and Mastodon who have found good results here, but that is anecdotal.
@AstroKatie The problem with Mastodon (for this aging science lover) is that you don't find new science communicators to follow as easily as you did on Twitter, so don't hear what they have to say. The 'keep you entertained' algorithms need a lot of work, but had a purpose.
@AstroKatie I don’t buy most complaints about Mastodon. Usually, people are either vague and say its too hard for some such and such reason. If you are an established science communicator with resources; respectfully, you can have your own instance and yes people will see your content. It is not hard to control your presence on Mastodon. I think a lot of this boils down to privileges that were taken for granted on other centralized social media platforms.
@AstroKatie I believe that two are related. People super exaggerate their difficulties using Mastodon and a whole lot of people are turned off by that. It’s not merely having to move to a whole new platform that’s the issue. I get that is totally annoying too. It’s that the old familiar platform allowed people to buy captive audiences and it was familiar to them.