Conversation

Notices

1. Santa Claes 🇸🇪🇭🇰🎅 (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Friday, 20-Jan-2023 18:28:48 UTC Santa Claes 🇸🇪🇭🇰🎅

   in reply to

   • Ruben
   • Sheril Kirshenbaum
   • Mike
   @MWilson Maybe you missed mastodon.social/@Sheril/109701… and the many many accounts by other women and men over the years saying the same thing.
   
   @trregeagle @Sheril
   ♲ mastodon.social/@Sheril/109701…
   • Mike (mwilson@masthead.social)'s status on Friday, 20-Jan-2023 18:28:55 UTC Mike

     in reply to

     • Ruben
     • Sheril Kirshenbaum

     @trregeagle @Sheril If you can’t see the fact men are more naturally drawn to certain fields, while women are more naturally drawn to others, then you really have no business calling anyone stupid.
     Should 50% of nurses be men? Or, is it only a “problem” when women are below 50%?

   • Ruben (trregeagle@social.mjd.id.au)'s status on Friday, 20-Jan-2023 18:28:57 UTC Ruben

     in reply to

     • Sheril Kirshenbaum
     • Mike
     @MWilson @Sheril That comment is irrelevant #simplefact
     
     By your argument perhaps we could justify only brown eyed people can do maths and blue eyes people do physics. It's a biological difference right?
     
     What about amputees maybe they can do biology better than French people?
     
     Do I sound stupid yet? You do.
   • Mike (mwilson@masthead.social)'s status on Friday, 20-Jan-2023 18:28:58 UTC Mike

     • Sheril Kirshenbaum

     @Sheril I’m all for equal opportunity. But the idea that every profession should be 50% male and 50% female ignores the simple fact that women and men are biologically different.