As excited as I am about Mastodon, stuff like this kills it for me. Over on Twitter Iβm seeing multiple reports of folks with a focus on social justice getting banned or suspended by some of the big instances. The analogy that keeps coming up is comparing Mastodon to white flight to the suburbs, and that is untenable.
@mcnees George Monbiot, Guardian columnist and environmental champion, has also been suspended at @georgemonbiot@birdsite.tcjc.uk. While it's clearly undesirable for an egotist like #elonmusk to have sole control of twitter, is it necessarily any better when multiple instances can make what seem like arbitrary decisions about moderation? If Musk is the problem, does federation potentially compound it? I want Mastodon to work, and I enjoy being here, but sometimes it feels a bit precarious. Kafkaesque even.
You're seeing multiple reports ofβ¦Β people being banned from instances without also sharing details on which instances or any details about the reasons for which they were bannedβ¦?
@dgoldsmith Iβm glad to hear they handled it. Hopefully this becomes useful input for how they identify and deal with malicious reports in the future.
@mcnees The moderation team is making mistakes, but Iβm not seeing any signs of malice towards marginalized people. Eugen has always been on the right side of that. But the moderation team needs some work, no doubt about it. Iβm not trying to make excuses, but there has never been a moderator or team in the history of forums/social media/you name it that never made mistakes. The goal is to get the rate down, and when a mistake is made be transparent about it and make it right.
@mcnees The new moderation team is very green. There is no doubt mastodon.social and mastodon.online are having growing pains from the explosive growth over the last 3 weeks.