@dch 4k wallpapers of some images on Ko-Fi: https://ko-fi.com/s/01b5cab43a (They're currently at 3β¬, forgot to set the additional pay-what-you-want. Will do that tomorrow. But if you feel generoud, I will give 100% of any payment to his human, who is a student and not making much money)
@dch Thanks. Unnatural looking grass is a main feature of infrared photography. Was rather surprised how natural cats appear in it. Humans certainly do not.
@markusl This kind of IR isn't thermal. Yes, I called it "IR", but "near infrared" would be more appropriate. It's a 550nm lowpass filter which lets parts of visible light through. Thermal radiation doesn't register in a relevant way. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_photography
May I ask an ignorant question? The cat is the biggest heat source in the photos, so why doesn't he or she glow red? If I were to take equivalent photos with my cheap thermal camera (which, I know, is a different technology), Balu would be by far the brightest object in the frame.
@markusl Yes, exactly! A friend (physicist) and I hat a lovely time shooting our electric stoves and seeing the heated coils showing up in IR earlier than they're visible to the human eye. It's also fun being able to see through the darkened ceramic glass.
@eyeling Ah, thanks. I hadn't realised that there was an order of magnitude between the wavelengths you're capturing and the wavelengths used in thermal imaging. Presumably, an object that was almost hot enough to glow red would shine brightly in a near-IR photo, but a healthy cat doesn't come close to that. π