Conversation

Notices

1. LinuxWalt (@lnxw48a1) {3EB165E0-5BB1-45D2-9E7D-93B31821F864} (lnxw48a1@nu.federati.net)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Jan-2021 02:52:33 UTC LinuxWalt (@lnxw48a1) {3EB165E0-5BB1-45D2-9E7D-93B31821F864}
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwqAInN9HWI
   
   A lawyer examines #Trump's role in the events of 2021-01-06.
   
   Worth viewing, even though there were 3-4 commercial breaks inserted by YouTube.
   
   I'm sure he has other videos about impeachment. I'd like to hear his opinion of what happens beyond removal from office. I suppose I could just read the Constitution and try to interpret it for myself, but as shown in the above-linked video, there is a lot of Supreme Court (and other federal courts') case law, plus statutes.
   • LinuxWalt (@lnxw48a1) {3EB165E0-5BB1-45D2-9E7D-93B31821F864} (lnxw48a1@nu.federati.net)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Jan-2021 03:47:07 UTC LinuxWalt (@lnxw48a1) {3EB165E0-5BB1-45D2-9E7D-93B31821F864}

     in reply to
     TL;DR: There's no clear case for incitement, but a very clear case for impeachment.
     Douglas A. Whitfield likes this.