MASTER LIST OF PRESUMABLY NON-SUCKY GIT HOSTING SOLUTIONS - bitbucket: corporate af, weird quotas, works generally fine, ui is... usable - gitlab: great software except the UI is FUCKING SHIT; main site suffered data loss once because of a postgres admin issue - gogs: see gitea (gogs maintainer got weird so the community forked) - gitea: self-hosted, lovely ui, lightweight. you probably want this.
@benhamill The issue that @er1n linked to is a good explanation why gitea is not dogfooding (yet), and I found this comment from another git hosting project in favor of not dogfooding (yet) pretty convincing:
I'm not 100% convinced, and the choice is super contextual, but it's good to see the arguments pro and con.
There's a similar argument around free software too. I lean toward "use free software if it's there, period", but I don't think the argument for "use the best tools available to better do your work" is stupid.