Conversation
Notices
-
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Friday, 17-Mar-2017 21:16:04 UTC reality karen teaduck III not sure how the first round of reviewers didn't realise that the authors CLEARLY DIDN'T EVEN DO A WEB SEARCH ABOUT THEIR SUBJECT -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Friday, 17-Mar-2017 21:29:59 UTC reality karen teaduck III @blp the problem in this case is that they claimed there was no previous work, while it's basically a whole research area -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Friday, 17-Mar-2017 21:35:54 UTC reality karen teaduck III @blp too bad, since the work otherwise is pretty good! i reckon that's a definite 'reject' reason rather than sub changes, though? -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Friday, 17-Mar-2017 21:39:38 UTC reality karen teaduck III @blp indeed! I queried my professor just in case, though. i'm quite confused that the first round of reviews didn't pick it up
-