Conversation

Notices

1. 🐝ｂｕｓｙ ｂｅｅ🐝 (hckr@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 09-Nov-2016 15:23:48 UTC 🐝ｂｕｓｙ ｂｅｅ🐝
   There's definitely some bullshit factor in the electoral college system. But almost anything Democrats say to repair it will be wrong. There should be an underlying cryptographic protocol, perhaps a ledger of vote transactions and a way to track proportional representation over some geographical area
   • Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) repeated this.
   • Christmas Personified as a Catgirl (moonman@shitposter.club)'s status on Thursday, 10-Nov-2016 05:08:27 UTC Christmas Personified as a Catgirl

     in reply to
     @hckr What you're describing is all completely inside the professional skillset of slot machine engineers, software and hardware.
     Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) likes this.
     Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) repeated this.
   • Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) (clackemovedtoheldscalla@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 10-Nov-2016 07:50:54 UTC Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)

     in reply to

     • Christmas Personified as a Catgirl
     @moonman @hckr Machine voting is inherently broken, more so than paper voting. Machine voting on paper is the only acceptable way.
   • Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) (clackemovedtoheldscalla@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 10-Nov-2016 07:51:30 UTC Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)

     in reply to

     • Christmas Personified as a Catgirl
     @moonman @hckr If machine voting is a given, yes, slot machine makers and slot machine regulations. But benefits of machine voting unclear.