Sorry I could not cut and past this. Basically the brief argues the opposite and says that incitement is not within the outer perimeter of the president's office.

Notices where this attachment appears

1. Teri Kanefield (teri_kanefield@law-and-politics.online)'s status on Friday, 06-Oct-2023 01:41:56 UTC Teri Kanefield

   in reply to

   Here is the fatal flaw in his argument: He claims that anything he does as president falls within the outer perimeter of his duties.

   Also, he is quoting from an amicus brief. (Screenshot #1)

   I found the brief he is quoting. You can see the original brief he is citing in screenshots #2 and #3.

   Well, goodness. The brief he is citing says the language of incitement is not part of a president's duties.

   The main point: An amicus brief is not law. It isn't authority for anything.

   9/