Some time after this HAMPDEN issued a publication of bis own, in which he denounced Mr. WALLAcE as a "har," a " swindler," and everything that was bad, persisting at the same time that bis (Mr. HaMPDEN's) was the correct theory. The libels, which were of the «TOssest nature, wore aggravated by the defendant asserting that Mr. WAlLACE was afraid to go into Court. Mr. WaLLACE Lad been eminently forbearing, but owing to the persistence ot Mr. HAMPDEN was compelled to take the present steps for his protection. Mr. WALLACE Was called. and stated that he had experienced a great deal of annoyance in consequence of Mr. HaupdEN's conduct; and the jury, atter a short deliberation, found a rerdict of £600 for the plaintiff.
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/109/656/318/922/540/401/original/9041bcfd691ace4a.jpeg