Notices by Sarah Laing (sklaing@quitter.is), page 2
-
Sarah Laing (sklaing@quitter.is)'s status on Wednesday, 06-Jul-2016 17:19:30 UTC Sarah Laing Just learned Chelsea Manning may have attempted suicide this morning. So sad what they've done to her. -
Sarah Laing (sklaing@quitter.is)'s status on Wednesday, 06-Jul-2016 17:19:30 UTC Sarah Laing Just learned Chelsea Manning may have attempted suicide this morning. So sad what they've done to her. -
Sarah Laing (sklaing@quitter.is)'s status on Monday, 04-Jul-2016 01:58:17 UTC Sarah Laing Tried indoor skydiving today. It felt a lot more like swimming in heavy air than floating on air. They say it takes about 100 hours to develop some modest skill at it, which comes out to a little more than $100K at $17 / minute. Makes cycling seem like a relatively modest hobby! -
Sarah Laing (sklaing@quitter.is)'s status on Saturday, 14-May-2016 01:47:13 UTC Sarah Laing Faced with sustained assault from angry reactionaries who want to outlaw trans people, I feel heartened and encouraged to see the federal government finally standing up to defend us. But at a time when humanity is confronted with multiple urgent existential threats arising from our collective failure to live peacefully and sustainably within the ecological constraints of our planet, it is dismaying to see such a large slice of our political bandwidth saturated with trans issues.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/obama-transgender-bathroom-students-title-ix-223170 -
Sarah Laing (sklaing@quitter.is)'s status on Wednesday, 06-Apr-2016 23:33:13 UTC Sarah Laing Temporary office overlooks the botanical garden in Palermo.
https://quitter.is/attachment/267337 https://quitter.is/attachment/267338 -
Sarah Laing (sklaing@quitter.is)'s status on Wednesday, 09-Mar-2016 18:37:08 UTC Sarah Laing @cmhobbs He surely did, but AlphaGo was not afraid to fight, either. And it seems like AlphaGo has developed pretty strong whole-board view. One analyst was making the case that some of its earliest fighting moves fully anticipated the end game, and it only seemed to grow stronger as the board filled in. Maybe Lee can think of some novel strategy that AlphaGo is not yet prepared to answer, but after what we just saw, future prospects for human players don't look very promising. :-( -
Sarah Laing (sklaing@quitter.is)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Jan-2016 23:49:17 UTC Sarah Laing Home and reeling after attending the hearing for SB 6443. Felt like just a handful of "us" amid a sea of frowning, angry faces. So much lies and distortions in the testimony - proponents basically called us all pedophile rapists, and now I'm worried they may actually win. Very discouraging. -
Sarah Laing (sklaing@quitter.is)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Dec-2015 18:40:04 UTC Sarah Laing @mangolazi @clacke @clacke@quitter.se @andresinmp I wonder what the mechanisms underlying the 250 figure m… -
Sarah Laing (sklaing@quitter.is)'s status on Wednesday, 14-Oct-2015 18:58:15 UTC Sarah Laing @clacke I started watching it and found a few good links to youtube by searching "democratic debate full v… -
Sarah Laing (sklaing@quitter.is)'s status on Wednesday, 14-Oct-2015 18:46:52 UTC Sarah Laing @zoowar Uh huh. When even that bastion of leftist revolutionary zeal, WaPo, credits Sanders with the win, … -
Sarah Laing (sklaing@quitter.is)'s status on Wednesday, 14-Oct-2015 18:08:17 UTC Sarah Laing Lol at NY Times saying Clinton won the first debate. All I heard from her was dissembling, avoidance, arro… -
Sarah Laing (sklaing@quitter.is)'s status on Wednesday, 07-Oct-2015 03:59:50 UTC Sarah Laing @steve "Falsely equivocated..." Maybe you meant falsely equated? ;)
"It is a process by which reliable facts are established, but the facts are only as good as the process. There is no room for authority; only assessment, verfication, and refutation."
To reiterate: what I was suggesting is that "only as good as the process" is a crucial caveat. When science and politics tangle, the process doesn't always function as well as it should, and when people see the process failing, a skeptical response is appropriate and justified. Denialism and anti-intellectualism are certainly wrong, but it would also be perilously naive to read science blindly with no consideration of the political and economic context in which it is done. -
Sarah Laing (sklaing@quitter.is)'s status on Tuesday, 06-Oct-2015 19:42:13 UTC Sarah Laing @steve R's question science when it appears to be in opposition to corporate interest. D's question science when it appears to serve corporate interest. With public funding for science under increasing pressure, Americans do not believe science is wholly objective and unswayed by funding sources, and the notion of "scientific consensus" appears naive. -
Sarah Laing (sklaing@quitter.is)'s status on Friday, 19-Dec-2014 20:43:29 UTC Sarah Laing Ack! Forgot to bring my e-reader today - will I now be compelled to converse with humans at lunch? Oh no no no no....