Notices by reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se), page 13
-
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2017 18:50:04 UTC reality karen teaduck III I wonder is 32 mins a decent time? Wish I could remember my times from 2015, but nice that reprogress has been quick -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2017 18:48:39 UTC reality karen teaduck III Back up to being able to run 5km [aerobic capacity intensifies] (and just in time too) -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2017 16:45:56 UTC reality karen teaduck III @johnnynull if you agree that it has developed logic, argumentation, science, maths, on what basis do you think it can no longer do this? -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2017 16:43:24 UTC reality karen teaduck III @johnnynull of course i don't think all problems in phil are worthwhile, but i believe it can, has and does produce worthwhile results -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2017 16:41:23 UTC reality karen teaduck III @johnnynull wasn't making that assumption, just giving an example of a text i think is practically useful -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2017 16:34:55 UTC reality karen teaduck III @johnnynull haha, hey, anyone can cite anything! -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2017 16:27:49 UTC reality karen teaduck III @johnnynull try reading 'free thought and official propaganda' for some useful philosophy -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2017 16:27:13 UTC reality karen teaduck III @johnnynull take some cursory looks at philosophy of x on wikipedia -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2017 16:26:53 UTC reality karen teaduck III @johnnynull philosophy continues to develop maths, continues to develop logic, continues to develop science -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2017 16:23:57 UTC reality karen teaduck III @johnnynull philosophy developed maths. philosophy developed logic. philosophy developed science. therefore, philosophy is useful -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2017 16:16:51 UTC reality karen teaduck III @johnnynull the direct study of things like logic and argument, under philosophy, enables their use in other disciplines -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2017 16:15:56 UTC reality karen teaduck III @johnnynull geometry is used in computer science and chemistry and physics, so mathematics is unneeded? -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2017 16:09:36 UTC reality karen teaduck III @johnnynull for example, the development of formal logic -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2017 16:09:28 UTC reality karen teaduck III @johnnynull but the results of this philosophical study of logic has implications for how we use logic outside of philosophy -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2017 16:07:53 UTC reality karen teaduck III @johnnynull not only mathematicians use maths, but i'd say they are engaging in mathematics when they do so -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2017 16:03:59 UTC reality karen teaduck III 18gb is not enough space for / -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2017 16:02:11 UTC reality karen teaduck III @johnnynull irrelevant, the point is that it's a philosophical problem, not a scientific problem, because it is dependent on reason -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2017 15:55:15 UTC reality karen teaduck III @johnnynull science itself is based on the philosophy of science, a set of assumptions science depends upon, e.g. an objective universe -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2017 15:52:50 UTC reality karen teaduck III @johnnynull so i think that from science we gain knowledge, but it is a matter of philosophy how we classify and organise this knowledge -
reality karen teaduck III (reality@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 26-Jun-2017 15:52:31 UTC reality karen teaduck III @johnnynull science cannot answer many of these questions, despite their relevance to it, e.g. http://ur1.ca/r2mvx