@Seirdy FWIW SourceHut is pretty poor accessibility-wise too. Little attention has been paid to it from what I can see.
Notices by Jookia 🌍 (jookia@social.tchncs.de)
-
Jookia 🌍 (jookia@social.tchncs.de)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Jul-2022 02:48:34 UTC Jookia 🌍 -
Jookia 🌍 (jookia@social.tchncs.de)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Jul-2022 02:48:33 UTC Jookia 🌍 @Seirdy it's inaccessible in ways that almost seem like they tried to make it broken: it has a hard to navigate maze-like site layout for one
-
Jookia 🌍 (jookia@social.tchncs.de)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Jul-2022 02:48:31 UTC Jookia 🌍 @Seirdy Basically read that WCAG section I mentione
-
Jookia 🌍 (jookia@social.tchncs.de)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Jul-2022 02:48:31 UTC Jookia 🌍 @Seirdy To be specific both Sourcehut (and your website) fail WCAG section 2.4 https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/#navigable