@clacke@loke@paulfree14@mairin They are convinced (without checking) that Mastodon outside of counter.social is riddled with bots and Russian propaganda. When I pointed out this isn't so, they reasoned it must be so, otherwise Jester wouldn't have had to put up those measures.
> How were the federated apis broken? I can see the federated timeline when Iâm on the site.
Oh, you're precious. Your federated timeline shows only local posts, because nobody else can get a post in. But of course the timeline is there!
Or, it's entirely possible that they only silenced everyone else but just don't allow anyone else to follow them. I don't have an account, so I won't bother investigating.
@loke #CounterSocial blocks IPs from six countries, plus more or less defederates from the Fediverse, to create a safe space.
@paulfree14 and I guess @gargron called them out on it -- on touting the benefits of Mastodon while isolating themselves from the core feature compared to Twitter and other silos: federation with other instances. Also on claiming that nationwide IP blocks would keep propaganda out, when propagandists know how to use a VPN.
Meanwhile, users of CS are ignorant and don't know what they're missing, as they can talk to other CS users just fine.
"There is a rise of fascism internationally; and Russia is acting as a banker and coordination center for it. And now it's spread to the GOP."
It's not "homegrown fascism OR Russian espionage".
It's BOTH.
However: Russia also backs fringe left-wing parties, and the message Russia is especially anxious to promote from all sides is "Everyone, ignore what Russia is doing".
@gargron @mairin @paulfree14 @loke @h The AGPL just says to give network users access to the source code, not that you need to retain networked features. If they have published source that can't reproduce their service, they should fix that rather than discontinue the service.
The trademark route sounds more likely, but then you'll need lawyers to see what you can actually do with trademarks.
@gargron @mairin @paulfree14 @loke @h @mareklach Not really. The Republicans and Democrats both occupy a narrow spectrum within the European-scale center-right with a hodge-podge nationalist-conservative-liberal-social-democracy ideology. The Conservatives are toward the right end of that narrow spectrum, the "Liberals" toward the left end.
It's militarist, jingoist and corporatist, and the social part is more Bismarck-stave-off-the-revolution[0] than social positive rights.
Depending on who hijacked the agenda at some point and what special interest groups shape the nation, specific policies in both parties may be much further left or right than the corresponding center-right policy in your generic European country.
[0] Not that there's anything wrong with that -- that's the social policy I favor.